Nick wrote:

> "F=ma" is not a model.  

I worked under a professor, for many years, at U.T. Austin, helping him design 
an intro-to-modern-physics course for the liberal arts honors major.  It was a 
very successful coarse, producing many students who remained in humanities or 
literature and had a strong conceptual understanding of what the scientists 
were doing, and each year a few others who transferred into science or math, 
and who now have much more secure academic positions than will ever be 
available to someone like me.

The professor (also named Austin), used to introduce this law by saying its 
important commitment was the possibility to divide an object from an external 
world.  That there could be unlimited complexity in what aspects of the 
external world went into the F, compatible with the fact that only one aspect 
of the object, encapsulated in m, and one aspect of the object’s embedding in 
the world, encapsulated in a, would govern the response.

Sometime later we would do general relativity, mentioning that Galileo had 
already presaged a certain delicacy in the Newton construction, when for 
gravity we could write F = mg, and cancel the m from both sides.  So sometimes 
one cuts the object and the external world between ma and F, and other times 
one just does geometry, as in Galileo’s a = g.

Of course, I don’t know what makes something “a model” or “not a model” in the 
lexicon you prefer to use to speak carefully, but I thought that this 
professor’s way of introducing the idea to the students was quite nice; much 
better than just starting with ladders against walls and computing forces and 
frictions and so forth, as would have been done within the physics major.

Eric 




> 
> Nick 
> 
> Nicholas Thompson
> Emeritus Professor of Ethology and Psychology
> Clark University
> [email protected]
> https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fwordpress.clarku.edu%2fnthompson%2f&c=E,1,eu2DD2gUBQd-iyzghwWuCIXVbwZuY1spgCdeU3Il-EpmUqkwLmMilqDIInwtHvtt7kw0v0Gubo0iXXF-YwTGquwDLw8FxOLAmpmXFF85K2uSDGOC3w8vug,,&typo=1
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Friam <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Jon Zingale
> Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2020 11:40 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [FRIAM] invoking quantum woo (was Book publishing advice
> needed)
> 
> Nick,
> 
> It has been said that Newton's mechanics "explain nothing and describe
> everything", where Leibniz's monads "explain everything and describe
> nothing". With regards to Newton, this position seems a bit strong to me.
> His *description* of falling bodies describes (in a forward direction, say)
> by assuming the geometry of the greeks and tracing the paths of bodies. With
> a beer or two in me, I could argue that his *explanation* of falling bodies
> explains (in the reverse direction) by comparing the trajectory of his
> falling body to the trajectory of our own Earth and moon and then claim that
> this is *because* Earths and moons are like Euclid's point and connected by
> Euclid's line. Is this just bad thinking?
> 
> Jon
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Sent from: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
> 
> - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe
> https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fredfish.com%2fmailman%2flistinfo%2ffriam_redfish.com&c=E,1,fHFLRLoS7V5lpkPlQJxm3GZEbwIvYZmf1K1HGvxCyWPavjOQ2ZZi40Ojv0ni_Hc3o498Jx-4ZV7JTqFYbZ8z3yGOqI0wUmTta3IFwZsEs9eIqrJ2VJCA&typo=1
> archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
> FRIAM-COMIC 
> https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2ffriam-comic.blogspot.com%2f&c=E,1,Ha_bukxZV6NrJ3Nk0zNuswOOIhTHYFPLn6brbz3s8sy4oDD9NNQhhe6qnPC7I25R2Uyg_WqEma0ZKTF2CXtbkPjG711vSO1KMY4Cr8FSD3qRw6kcFA,,&typo=1
>  
> 
> 
> - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
> un/subscribe 
> https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fredfish.com%2fmailman%2flistinfo%2ffriam_redfish.com&c=E,1,uqOgmYBiSS0x7Wi-Zf0FrFt4NrkETu8icf2X8gWO6YFjFRvJBzUMDGWbH1269djMj4Kk0wf49luFtzYXFMK-F0_4AL3xNKMkOiOJcRteGo8ZjkT4aCfpUarYpEEU&typo=1
> archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
> FRIAM-COMIC 
> https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2ffriam-comic.blogspot.com%2f&c=E,1,aCo8Crog_H8bjHe3FfDqu-ler9w6gieNRr1wcLtIp5jMQFqDeB43WkQoHKnZ54sL0zzOdO_jpTZEeaQ89PNBFqt7gU4xQnUIqhSuG9a-7HfDCNs,&typo=1
>  


- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ 

Reply via email to