>From my perspective, it is helpful to consider a larger history of the consciousness debate. In what could be considered *the beginning of theend* of African slavery in the west, natural philosophers would seek to find in the physiology of black men structures to explain their *inferiority* and in some extreme cases their *inhumanity*. Neal Stephenson, in his *BaroqueCycle* (~)trilogy, caricatures *how embarrassing white people **be* when in the pursuit of the consciousness question. In the novel, a Nigerian born linguist named Dappa attempts, through the power of words and ideas, to argue for the freedom of enslaved people in the west (circa the 1660s). Meanwhile, many spectators look on and muse about how nearly human Dappa's arguments sound, but ultimately *must not be confused* with the utterances of a *reasoning being*. Stephenson highlights the cruelty and tyranny that enterprises like these can create. The Turing test generally reeks of this sort of pursuit. Rather than beginning with the assumption that the other experiences and then wondering what that experience is like, we set up an endless procession of tests which on the one hand we hope will *converge* in the limit to understanding, and which on the other will *entertain* us in the meantime. The Turing test has appeared to me to be a horrible diversion from the discovery of more promising methodologies. One day, perhaps there will be a construction that passes all acceptable Turing tests, and this day will be a sad day because we will likely still have no answers to our initial investigations regarding what it is to be conscious and what it is to *experience as another does*. Perhaps, the question will be considered solved for *all time* and the potential needed to reopen the topic exceedingly expensive. Somewhere, Minsky expressed remorse for how some of his results in the field of AI had managed to close the general AI question for decades, ultimately shifting the pursuit away from the hard question and instead towards the pursuit of novel gadgets. In the spirit of EricC's comments about the distinction of surface tension and PH, if consciousness is a thing, then it should be so whether or not we all agree.
- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. . FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/ FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
