It's difficult to tell whether it's obtuse. That depends a bit on who's trying to understand the model. But, yes, it's definitely a naturfact. I think it would be safe to argue that all analog computers are further along toward the natural object end of the spectrum than digital computers.
On 8/10/20 12:09 PM, Frank Wimberly wrote: > high quality flight simulator based on ball/disk integrators. I'm wondering > whether it was obtuse. I had a private pilot's license and it was certified > by the FAA in a way that I could log time toward my Instrument Rating by > using it. I used it for dozens of hours but I didn't log the time. I did > became very confident about controlling and airplane at night or in > instrument conditions (IMC if I recall correctly). Would you call that a > naturfact? -- ↙↙↙ uǝlƃ - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. . FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/ FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
