*My worry was that a voting system should not be mysterious* Again, and hopefully for the last time on this post: I _do_ think this is possible and I _am_ suggesting ideas that could be used as a starting point (given that higher level wizards are prone to navel-gazing and collecting social security). The continued use of *mystery* as an impossibility proof remains infuriatingly inept. What I continue to hear from that perspective is, "Let's all commit to the impossibility of knowing and just be done with the enlightenment project already". The idea, for those that bother to read, is to have a transparent and open-source development process. That some will forever be illiterate is sad, but many many many will be capable of reading the code. We already have the app, it is the USPS, so stop with the impossibility proofs already.
-- Sent from: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/ - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. . FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/ FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
