I rather liked his characterization of Derrida's work as *all is text*, and that the best we can do from the privileged perspective of logos is to compare descriptions.
[1] "As analytic philosophers might prefer to put it, thought and language are capable of determining things only up to isomorphism". [2] "If that's right, there's no principled difference between describing reality and describing a system of signs, a text, language itself". Through the lens of Lawvere's fixed point theorem, I am compelled to think of Derrida's idea as Godel incompleteness for logos itself: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NddnaeZ03JE -- Sent from: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/ - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. . FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/ FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
