OK. I suppose we have the option of taking on a burden of going through your 
old posts and finding where you address the following: That a digital voting 
app runs the risk of exacerbating the type of exploitation we saw in 2016.

I've done that and you have *not* addressed that objection, which is why I 
raised it. If you feel you have addressed it, I would sincerely appreciate some 
help finding where you did so. A simple restatement of how you mitigate that 
risk would be fine. There's no need for spelunking.

On 8/23/20 9:21 AM, jon zingale wrote:
Glen (and hopefully not one of your bots >8^D),

The 'code' exists as the writings I have already produced. You are making
claims that are not in the writing. Since it has already been written once,
I don't really wish to re-write. Even this sidebar of bickering in-post is
lame. I am simply not suggesting things that you attribute to me, which I
find frustrating to see propagated over the forum. I feel that you are using
an image of me (or my writing) to push some thoughts you have that are
tangentially related to my posts. If that is the case, I suppose I can
adjust. But to those that respond to the image, I wish to disambiguate my
posts from it.

- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/

Reply via email to