Jon, 

 

FWIW, to Peirce, Mathematics was a distillation of Logic, and logic a 
distillation of "right thought"-- how we should think if we desire to hold that 
belief most likely to endure.  Peirce fuzzed the distinction between the 
empirical and thegsb logical.  All thought … including perception, of course … 
was in signs, and all signs were inferences.  He believed that logic was 
entangled in every experience, a believe that becomes incontrovertible if you 
look at the wiring of the visual system, which is obviously and evidently a 
logic board.  

Nick

 

Nicholas Thompson

Emeritus Professor of Ethology and Psychology

Clark University

[email protected]

https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Friam <[email protected]> On Behalf Of jon zingale
Sent: Thursday, October 8, 2020 10:42 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] labels

 

>From the article.

 

"Philosophers have always been divided about the roles of logic (formal

reasoning) and, by extension, of mathematics. There have been empiricists who 
regard reasoning as just a tool to help organize the knowledge that derives 
from our senses. And there have been rationalists who treat reason as a mode of 
mystical, direct access to ultimate truths, one which bypasses sense 
experience."

 

It may be surprising to hear, wrt the paragraph above, I identify as an 
empiricist. A psychological (particularly phenomenological) grounding for 
mathematics is very important to me. That we have group theory, IMO, follows 
from the fact that the world affords us a notion of symmetry (including the 
recognition of asymmetry). I am to some extent pragmatist in that the 
symmetries I experience are *good enough* to be ontological objects, and the 
idea of Symmetry (writ large) is a limit afforded by that pragmatism. Over the 
last week, I fell down a Piaget hole thanks to a Jordan Peterson lecture at the 
University of Toronto[Ϯ]. While EricC has done quite a bit over the week to 
help me to move on from there, I am still left with a deep interest in how we 
come to develop the repositories of knowledge that we do, Mathematics 
especially. For me, Mathematics is a theory (in the sense of a systematically 
organized body of knowledge) and its theorems tell us about the experience and 
the intimacy of perception.

 

[Ϯ]  <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BQ4VSRg4e8w> 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BQ4VSRg4e8w

 

 

 

--

Sent from:  <http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/> 
http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/

 

- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .

FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv

Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe  
<http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com> 
http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com

archives:  <http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/> 
http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/

FRIAM-COMIC  <http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/> 
http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ 

- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ 

Reply via email to