Don’t worry about it. 

 

Thread hygiene has never been one of FRIAM’s strong suits. 

 

n

 

Nicholas Thompson

Emeritus Professor of Ethology and Psychology

Clark University

 <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]

 <https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/> 
https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/

 

 

From: Friam <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Russ Abbott
Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2020 2:28 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] How to Repurpose Your Old Gadgets Step away from the trash 
bin!

 

Sorry, this should have been a new topic.

 

-- Russ Abbott                                       
Professor, Computer Science
California State University, Los Angeles

 

 

On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 1:27 PM Russ Abbott <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

Does anyone think there is anything to this 
<https://neurosciencenews.com/electromagnetic-consciousness-17191/> ?

 

Electromagnetic energy in the brain enables brain matter to create our 
consciousness and our ability to be aware and think, according to a new theory 
developed by Professor Johnjoe McFadden from the University of Surrey. 

 

When neurons in the brain and nervous system fire, they not only send the 
familiar electrical signal down the wire-like nerve fibres, but they also send 
a pulse of electromagnetic energy into the surrounding tissue. Such energy is 
usually disregarded, yet it carries the same information as nerve firings, but 
as an immaterial wave of energy, rather than a flow of atoms in and out of the 
nerves.

This electromagnetic field is well-known and is routinely detected by 
brain-scanning techniques such as electroencephalogram (EEG) and 
magnetoencephalography (MEG) but has previously been dismissed as irrelevant to 
brain function. Instead, McFadden proposes that the brain’s information-rich 
electromagnetic field is in fact itself the seat of consciousness, driving 
‘free will’ and voluntary actions.

This new theory also accounts for why, despite their immense complexity and 
ultra-fast operation, today’s computers have not exhibited the slightest spark 
of consciousness; however, with the right technical development, robots that 
are aware and can think for themselves could become a reality.

Johnjoe McFadden, Professor of Molecular Genetics and Director of the Quantum 
Biology Doctoral Training Centre at the University of Surrey, said: “How brain 
matter becomes aware and manages to think is a mystery that has been pondered 
by philosophers, theologians, mystics and ordinary people for millennia. I 
believe this mystery has now been solved, and that consciousness is the 
experience of nerves plugging into the brain’s self-generated electromagnetic 
field to drive what we call ‘free will’ and our voluntary actions.”

 

 

I'm especially concerned about the final sentence that claims that 
consciousness is the experience of nerves plugging into the brain's 
electromagnetic field.

 

That seems to assume what it's trying to explain. Even if all the rest of it 
makes sense (and I'm not in a position to judge), what does it mean for nerves 
to "experience" anything? Isn't that the issue to be explained?

 

 

-- Russ Abbott                                       
Professor, Computer Science
California State University, Los Angeles

- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ 

Reply via email to