All,

 

Nobody seems to have the energy for a conversation about emergence right now, 
but if we were to, I would hope we would start with saying what we thought 
emergence is. 

 

My working definition comes from Wimsatt.  He starts by defining aggregativity 
as a property of whole which is pretty much dependent on the number of the 
elements that compose it.  Weight is an aggregate property of a football team.  
He then defines emergence as a failure of aggregativity.  Winning ability is an 
emergent property of a football team because it depends on how you organize the 
players, not simply on their weight.  (eg, you  put the heavier players on the 
line, the lighter, faster players in the backfield or ends).  He concludes that 
emergence is the rule and aggregativity a rarity. 

 

I like this definition because, unlike many others, it does not depend on 
“surprise” or “ignorance”. 

N

 

Nicholas Thompson

Emeritus Professor of Ethology and Psychology

Clark University

 <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]

 <https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/> 
https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/

 

 

From: Friam <[email protected]> On Behalf Of David Eric Smith
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2020 11:32 AM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Getting You Libertarians' Goats

 

I’m actually quite on board with your wish to make these questions more 
interesting than they may have started out, Nick.

 

And I also think you are right that the namers meant the names to carry weight. 
 (Though I also think most thought is a bit hurried and careless, and gives 
itself more credit than is earned.)

 

The interesting struggle will be that the original calculation was in a way 
rather small, compared to the metaphor that many hope can be spun from it.

 

Or perhaps said another way, maybe many of these things that have weight to 
compel as we experience them in life, are pointers to little mechanics below 
the surface that, in its own terms, is a small thing.

 

I know that in each paper I write, I imagine getting at a big idea, and realize 
that the most I have done is a small calculation.  So there is a foot in each 
boat….

 

Best,

 

Eric

 





On Oct 29, 2020, at 1:20 PM, <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

 

Sorry everybody.  I seem to be out of my depth in  many pools at once. 

 

I really like Eric’s analysis.  

 

I still want to protest abit.  I think the dynamic relation between the 
physical concept  and the physicist’s humanistic metaphor is much more 
interesting than this analysis would suggest.  Physicists use those metaphors 
for a reasons, cognitive and communicatory.  And humanists are right to explore 
their implications.  Otherwise, it would be fair for the humanist to turn to 
the physicist and say, “Shut up and calculate.”

 

The paradox of development (AKA epigenisis) is that there are all sorts of 
futures that can be known pretty precisely about a developing individual yet 
they are totally unknown to the individual that is developing.  It has to do 
with our discussion of intenSion, a few months back. 

 

It may also be time for one of you to be delegated to “elder” me, in the quaker 
tradition.  “Now, Nick, ….”

 

N .

 

N

 

Nicholas Thompson

Emeritus Professor of Ethology and Psychology

Clark University

 <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]

 
<https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fwordpress.clarku.edu%2fnthompson%2f&c=E,1,8pikIqjsWmNuBHfzE3VVLQF4_vkvnGX1oPfmWg4qJVbO9ts2bygQUBET758DUPmA4dH0McR2MMXhK_cL-slNT6tfSaWx6GP41uIIowPT-1XJk62VKA,,&typo=1>
 https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/

 

 

From: Friam <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > On 
Behalf Of David Eric Smith
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2020 10:00 AM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> >
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Getting You Libertarians' Goats

 

I want to somehow say sigh and sigh on this thread.

 

It comes somehow straight out of Monty Python (Blessed are the cheesemakers….)

 

1. Some physicists figure out how to do a calculation, showing that some parts 
can go dynamically into an organized state, appealing to a combination of their 
own shapes and laws of large numbers for events that happen, and they don’t 
need to have the organized form imposed by any outside boundary conditions 
beyond the very low-level rules for how the events are sampled.  They already 
knew this happens in equilibrium, because that is how anything freezes.  But 
here they are seeing it in a dynamical context, where the ordered form happens 
to be more ordered than the states they could produce from somehow-similar 
components in equilibrium.

 

2. Physicsts, like everyone, are usually impatient and don’t want to have to 
recite the whole operational meaning of something every time they want to refer 
to it in the course of saying something else.

 

3. So the physicists come up with a tag.  It should be sort of evocative, sort 
of catchy, and easy to remember.  Aha!  “Self-organization”, to keep in mind 
that the organization is resulting from low-level local features, and not from 
the boundary conditions imposed on the system beyond that local stuff.

 

4. Nick encounters the term.  It happens to contain two words about which he 
cares very very much, so to him they are not mere hackage generated by some 
physicists, but freighted with meaning.

 

5. Nick starts a thread: Which self?  Is it the same self before and after?  Is 
“organized” here a transitive or an intransitive verb?  If transitive, what is 
the object?  Can the same referent be both object and subject of a transitive 
verb?  Does that make the verb reflexive?  What are the implications for 
monists?  For dualists?

 

6. Friam is willing to engage.

 

7.  I write a long tedious email, trying to remind the humanists that the most 
important character trait of physicists is impatience.  

 

Eric

 

 






On Oct 29, 2020, at 10:03 AM, Prof David West <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

 

Nick,

 

" I am always troubled by the notion of "self-assembly" since the self that is

assembling is never, by definition, the self that is assembled."

 

By what definition? Your monist view that the self lacks ontological status in 
the first place?

 

davew

 

 

On Wed, Oct 28, 2020, at 5:48 PM, [email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]>  wrote:

> Jon,

> 

> Is a steam governor a case of downward causation?

> 

> This question will reveal, no doubt, that I don't understand  your previous

> answer, but perhaps others will explain it to me. 

> 

> I am always troubled by the notion of "self-assembly" since the self that is

> assembling is never, by definition, the self that is assembled. 

> 

> Perhaps I am getting tangled up in words again. 

> 

> n

> 

> Nicholas Thompson

> Emeritus Professor of Ethology and Psychology

> Clark University

> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 

> https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/ 
> <https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fwordpress.clarku.edu%2fnthompson%2f&c=E,1,aryOhfVU48KQtN6xZTrA9DuKF6rEe-ZppSYOdQn_1Py6Cpgt586u2buLg3DjT-c0qFESZFBn3sJm21uO2hXWV9yFGAeZn5lBmiyLY_mGvBNki6JGqZr5Vawr0Cc,&typo=1>
>  

>  

> 

> 

> -----Original Message-----

> From: Friam <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > 
> On Behalf Of jon zingale

> Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2020 2:01 PM

> To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 

> Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Getting You Libertarians' Goats

> 

> Nick,

> 

> Let's say I have a language designed to work with sticks, where for

> instance, it makes sense to name certain relations *Triangle*. Additionally,

> let's assume that the language is detailed enough to include less obvious

> relations such as those which relate sticks to trees to soil and water.

> Would it be cheap to narrowly define *downward causation* as the

> manipulation of the world in accordance with this language to produce new

> sticks?

> 

> Consider as another example when one manipulates charge in bulk using analog

> filters. Here, a circuit designer may not need to know about spin or

> superposition or a lot of other details about the universe. In fact, the

> designer may not know how to write a "mid-frequency ranged filter" if they

> were only given a quantum mechanical view of the world. They may, however,

> know how to build such a filter if they are given appropriately shaped

> conductive surfaces and coils.

> 

> My apologies in advance if this characterization (that of reducing *downward

> causation* to manipulation of a domain-specific language) is horribly

> flawed, but I spent this much time writing a response. So, there.

> 

> 

> 

> --

> Sent from: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/

> 

> - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .

> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv

> Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam 
> <https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fbit.ly%2fvirtualfriam&c=E,1,zhxU_vVsv9ENmY6yW-55DVmQnncjIyPjCFenNa3XEtLxEL8xhX_QAfgYpjkV9cQ4IohBspSDnV8mV7WutWnldm44IZkG045VfMLnwKaqTg,,&typo=1>
>   un/subscribe

> http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com 
> <https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fredfish.com%2fmailman%2flistinfo%2ffriam_redfish.com&c=E,1,zSuFFkbd2DB0WcR93zZDt047YkF5bz9HTAsYGTKqCdN75lkxCyZnxlBiiF1sGSpMEfCrGhdhRfg3eBXPgvsT7N3mon8c8OVcelM3PYT1MGJVqeJf3mw,&typo=1>
>  

> archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/

> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ 
> <https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2ffriam-comic.blogspot.com%2f&c=E,1,mMqPyYeW8ru9GQWtxdbUB0n44q_5nLgSXy07t4V_AsmClsmtDPbtdvMOz-5MxQ5tWxFBJ8qcivsQfM9aR7aK_isMHCQNQDj-a2dz12hk9AAiuS2OI4gVareAMd8,&typo=1>
>   

> 

> 

> - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .

> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv

> Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam 
> <https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fbit.ly%2fvirtualfriam&c=E,1,B4cpuipzEG2eXsg7O70StTcbpgFg93n963u1h7h2e1VpwBe6yBONsECLa3GSlIhGn8pycQdagHTkalE4sosaj1Mnnq89IyVdHryiSM1sDiQwa85TIy_SIRE,&typo=1>
>  

> un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com 
> <https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fredfish.com%2fmailman%2flistinfo%2ffriam_redfish.com&c=E,1,P_kQbfRSHI5BkhTTOTUPwqVrHwhKyPcEEk3KwdTr3xnUZqrUqqUU7oDomuwnfRjpvDJFV_54QfVcg25ZSLB9qFkD_5YtR6cg6wv2fYyKGePArr-803HxHg,,&typo=1>
>  

> archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/

> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ 
> <https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2ffriam-comic.blogspot.com%2f&c=E,1,_RcewwAYYcKcZuYr7ske1OgUoicI88EhT0ozpEjBK48bH6Qwd7lzSF5UFDTC0Ava8FAorp9VEX85dfKa7BWyBXPosSceC8bdEyBfoKehuOgJlakgU6L45augzw,,&typo=1>
>   

> 

- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6   
<https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fbit.ly%2fvirtualfriam&c=E,1,8j6zuxACaM_WBxlkXRZ401XK7pgfm7Grk6LoTaAV0cUpPdh6WFwi3aycBY390zKzJTY2RXCG3Co-hpsg_5NOADi8J8gzFwp30lY4kKUe&typo=1>
 bit.ly/virtualfriam
un/subscribe  
<https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fredfish.com%2fmailman%2flistinfo%2ffriam_redfish.com&c=E,1,bc_gzuzh3V3ZXtRz_O83L9-oJlS_5AAcAGIlFgA2YaH6lFuHiLOsxqxuBHW2vmqTKKLnrt55qhgFOM6v8ZkXHCTIGtv5eWgB2WekDaH4&typo=1>
 
https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fredfish.com%2fmailman%2flistinfo%2ffriam_redfish.com&c=E,1,bc_gzuzh3V3ZXtRz_O83L9-oJlS_5AAcAGIlFgA2YaH6lFuHiLOsxqxuBHW2vmqTKKLnrt55qhgFOM6v8ZkXHCTIGtv5eWgB2WekDaH4&typo=1
archives:  <http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/> 
http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC  
<https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2ffriam-comic.blogspot.com%2f&c=E,1,Hv5_wjiqb-eAmU6QZbjPuZ0VfLQtR8HXARb1C6SyiSD1u8XVz2gSFEQIpVd6FcPdLTRhjJj7FPLRjdkkFoTv9bCYMGsBg9_JywfA7X4BGzE_TQ,,&typo=1>
 
https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2ffriam-comic.blogspot.com%2f&c=E,1,Hv5_wjiqb-eAmU6QZbjPuZ0VfLQtR8HXARb1C6SyiSD1u8XVz2gSFEQIpVd6FcPdLTRhjJj7FPLRjdkkFoTv9bCYMGsBg9_JywfA7X4BGzE_TQ,,&typo=1

 

- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam 
<http://bit.ly/virtualfriam> 
un/subscribe 
https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fredfish.com%2fmailman%2flistinfo%2ffriam_redfish.com
 
<https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fredfish.com%2fmailman%2flistinfo%2ffriam_redfish.com&c=E,1,IEbkPyPoEmNxtfcCzvlRdgAgcRD5alKgjbALyoORazFB7lkGbQMJz6F7AaZCyEIQXnYvWl6RwACVbpi9h3bgIpqgkfQCs6WQ3hz7YuOCYtr5QC0FGgvsUlTCkjVa&typo=1>
 
&c=E,1,IEbkPyPoEmNxtfcCzvlRdgAgcRD5alKgjbALyoORazFB7lkGbQMJz6F7AaZCyEIQXnYvWl6RwACVbpi9h3bgIpqgkfQCs6WQ3hz7YuOCYtr5QC0FGgvsUlTCkjVa&typo=1
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC 
https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2ffriam-comic.blogspot.com%2f 
<https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2ffriam-comic.blogspot.com%2f&c=E,1,VmZOKmmfgscmm08sqFURYYLfwTvhRvJuJPRX7KhzfkHQ6bPosmgeM0aZSiTrrl2_gt71JL5CrV4RYHQ65ehAhUPVdYUHB9jz_fv9Rh08mg,,&typo=1>
 
&c=E,1,VmZOKmmfgscmm08sqFURYYLfwTvhRvJuJPRX7KhzfkHQ6bPosmgeM0aZSiTrrl2_gt71JL5CrV4RYHQ65ehAhUPVdYUHB9jz_fv9Rh08mg,,&typo=1
 

 

- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ 

Reply via email to