I think of a flywheel.   A flywheel with a lot of mass may indeed spin up, but 
it takes a lot of power to do that.
In contrast, one can spin up a wheel on an upside down bicycle and it is easy 
to start and stop.   The lack of heft or seriousness is what I associate with 
Glen’s usage.

From: Friam <[email protected]> On Behalf Of [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2020 10:50 AM
To: 'The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group' <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] The next Heterodox University faculty member

Hi Marcus,

But what is the metaphor, here?  When people say “spin up /down” I think of a 
centrifuge.  What is it that you think of?

N


Nicholas Thompson
Emeritus Professor of Ethology and Psychology
Clark University
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/



From: Friam <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> On 
Behalf Of Marcus Daniels
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2020 12:29 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] The next Heterodox University faculty member

I think of being “spin up” or “spun down” in this context as someone who has 
too little self-control.
Someone that is easily “spun down” can be easy manipulated into despair.   They 
are the audience for programs like CNN Heros, or people that go on spiritual 
retreats.    Someone that is easily “spun up” may lack the ability to see the 
consequences of their mania.   Like JD Vance’s mother who would never speak at 
a reasonable volume when screaming would do.   Both are too coupled and 
reactive to their environment.

From: Friam <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> On 
Behalf Of [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2020 9:57 AM
To: 'The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group' 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] The next Heterodox University faculty member

Mmmmm!

I always assumed that it had to do with diseases (rabies?) associated with 
bats.  People who cleaned belfries got sick.  Kind of like, “mad as a hatter”.  
What is wonderfiul about all of this is that how our attempts to understand 
metaphors that other people use leads to new meanings of the metaphor.  Surely 
“spin up” and “spin off” arise from totally different realms of discourse.  
Shirley? And “spin” in the political sense arises from a totally different 
realm, entemology: i.e., to “spin a web of deceit.”

Nick


Nicholas Thompson
Emeritus Professor of Ethology and Psychology
Clark University
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/



From: Friam <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> On 
Behalf Of Stephen Guerin
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2020 11:42 AM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] The next Heterodox University faculty member

Glen, your wingnut footnote put me in the mood to chase down the origin of 
"batshit crazy". Here's one that makes sense:

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=batshit%20crazy
A person who is batshit crazy is certifiably nuts. The phrase has origins in 
the old fashioned term "bats in the belfry." Old churches had a structure at 
the top called a belfry, which housed the bells. Bats are extremely sensitive 
to sound and would never inhabit a belfry of an active church where the bell 
was rung frequently. Occasionally, when a church was abandoned and many years 
passed without the bell being rung, bats would eventually come and inhabit the 
belfry. So, when somebody said that an individual had "bats in the belfry" it 
meant that there was "nothing going on upstairs" (as in that person's brain). 
To be BATSHIT CRAZY is to take this even a step further. A person who is 
batshit crazy is so nuts that not only is their belfry full of bats, but so 
many bats have been there for so long that the belfry is coated in batshit. 
Hence, the craziest of crazy people are BATSHIT CRAZY.




On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 10:19 AM uǝlƃ ↙↙↙ 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

http://www.quantumthom.com/LetterToFerrisCommunity.pdf
https://fsutorch.com/2020/11/18/science-professor-denies-science/
> The account’s other tweets in regard to COVID-19 say things such as:
> “Guess what the covid stunt has failed. You won’t get your leftist new world 
> order.”
> “Covid19 is another jewish revolution.”
> “F— this evil wizard,” in reference to a video of Dr. Anthony Fauci.
> “Stand up for yourselves people, and stop falling for this corona virus hoax!”
> “I’d say covid-19 is fake. An evil medical system just killed a bunch of old 
> people.”


From the Amazon page for his book:
"Thomas Brennan is a professor of physics at Ferris State University in Big 
Rapids, Michigan, where he's taught physics and astronomy since 2014. He 
completed his PhD thesis on the topic of sonoluminescence in 2009 at the 
Illinois Institute of Technology. He also received a BA in Physics from the 
University of Chicago and an MS in Physics from UCLA. His research interests 
include both experimental and mathematical physics as well as astronomy."

I continue to marvel at how someone seemingly intelligent can fly off the bolt 
[⛧] so easily. As one who regularly expresses my opinions about 
non-professional things, I consistently wonder how/when it will or has already 
come back to bite me, not to assert that I'm seemingly intelligent or anything. 
It also questions the coherence of the "public intellectual", best exhibited by 
people like Chomsky, or Pinker, or Tyson. We need them ... but they put 
themselves at great risk. So thanks to all those people who manage to speak 
outside their competence, but do so without flying off the bolt.


[⛧] Yes, I'm aware that "wingnut" is often understood as a nut who sits on the 
wing of a political spectrum. But I prefer to think of it as someone who's 
easily "spun up", spun on, or spun off. This fits nicely with the old saying 
that there's a fine line between genius and crazy, it's only a difference in 
chirality. That batsh¡t old man who spends his lifetime in his basement working 
on his time machine exhibits the same dedication as the non-batsh¡t 
microbiologist who spends his lifetime in the cancer lab. They're both easily 
spun up, wingnuts on a different spectrum.

--
↙↙↙ uǝlƃ

- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  
bit.ly/virtualfriam<http://bit.ly/virtualfriam>
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ 

Reply via email to