Right. Except that these little machines are not merely learning a static string. They're *writing* to the string at the same time they're reading it.
On 12/1/20 10:12 AM, Marcus Daniels wrote: > Map Nick's list of numbers to a spatiotemporal snapshot of the physical > world. The dog and the human have both learned how to learn about it. > Whether it took 1 year, 8000 years, or 2.7 billion years sort of doesn’t > matter in the argument except that the new AI needs enough time to perform > experiments to learn the consequences and meaning of different patterns of > numbers. If the list of numbers describes every possible action that the AI > could take and how that particular path would be recorded, then any given > experiment could in principle be encapsulated in a single set of numbers; it > is just a matter of what cells in the hyperspace the AI decides to look at. -- ↙↙↙ uǝlƃ - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. . FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/ FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
