I think we should not get so hung up on the dying and going crazy.   The 
numbers aren't like COVID-19.   There's nothing the wackos could really do to 
get to numbers like that, other them to kill themselves by eating too many 
jerky sticks.   There's the national embarrassment aspect that could bleed over 
into national security, and of course there is the lunatic with the nuke codes.

If a site intends to do something distasteful but not quite illegal, why would 
they ever tie themselves to platform where it is so trivial to be turned off?  
They deserve it just for their lack of foresight. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Friam <[email protected]> On Behalf Of u?l? ???
Sent: Monday, January 11, 2021 11:16 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] yay!

I'd begun preparing this long post saying nothing. So I deleted it. Nick's done 
a good job, here, except that I completely disagree with his assertion that 
sought divergence is boring and sophist. Convergence is fine. But often 
convergence can be premature or artificial. What we (and presumably Peirce) 
want is *good* convergence ... the right kind of convergence. Convergence at 
the right rate, with error correcting processes, enough heat to strengthen but 
not burn the metal, etc. And *that* is ethics. There's a large number of people 
who've converged on QAnon. Sure, that convergence will *eventually* fade 
because it's garbage. In the meantime, people are dying and going crazy. What 
to do in that meantime? How do we diverge from QAnon and settle into a better 
convergence *sooner* than we would otherwise? Divergence and convergence are 
not disjoint things, one to be rejected and another adopted.

Anyway, should Parler be deplatformed? Should Gebru have been 
fired/deplatformed by Google? Should I actually give some eyeball time to OAN 
just to see what kind of bullsh¡t they say? Should Weinstein have been run out 
of Evergreen into the welcoming arms of Heterodox?

There's no grand unified ethical program for resolving these questions. That's 
not what ethics is. We must be (methodological) pluralists. Instead, it's a set 
of languages and lexicons for naming the components and discussing their 
relationships. In many ways, having such language *deescalates* conflict 
because rather than saying some value is "wrong" or "evil", we can call it by 
its ethics name and bias the convergence so that it satisfices multiple 
objectives. It's similar to, say, "the disease model of alcoholism". By naming 
it as a disease, we free up discussion of it from the *converged* concept that 
alcoholics are simply morally degenerate. And that works even *if* alcoholism 
is nothing like a disease.

It strikes me that, in these interesting times, we're recognizing that 
deplatforming has always been A Thing. But because of the state of our culture 
and technology, we've now identified it and *need* to talk about it. I would 
claim ethics gives us the language to do so.


On 1/11/21 10:42 AM, [email protected] wrote:
> Ok, so, FWIW, a Peircean take on ethics is that it is like any other 
> form of inquiry.  To the extent that the participants are seeking a 
> convergence, it is interesting and useful; to the extent that they are 
> seeking divergence, for its own sake, it is boring and sophistic.  It 
> is in that sense that he regards logic as a subfield of ethics.  Logic is how 
> we "should" think.
> The whole goal of thought, whether ethical or scientific,  is to 
> anticipate experience as it will be, not as we'ld like it to be.

--
↙↙↙ uǝlƃ

- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe 
http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ 
- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ 

Reply via email to