You need a foundation for the courts, a value system, a constitution, a set of laws. Your "for starters" is way downstream ... i.e. it's not a starter at all.
On 1/11/21 12:39 PM, [email protected] wrote: > I can see how my #1, with its knee-jerk pragmatism, might be a flag to a > bull. I am really trying to get to #5 on my list above, and I don’t much > care how I get there. I want us to cogitate. For instance, what is the jury > pool for the digital court*/. For starters, “Every user of the internet, > verified as an inididual person, is a member of the jury pool. Jury pool > members agree, when “summoned”, to participate in a digital jury. Digital > jurors shall serve as finders of fact in digital trials /* -- ↙↙↙ uǝlƃ - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. . FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/ FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
