It would be a fun experiment to adopt a few posting rules like this and see if 
it works. E.g. we've talked about thread hygiene a lot, top-posting vs. 
interleaving, [foot|end]notes, etc. Being antimethod, I'm against it all, of 
course. But it would be fun to play the game for awhile. Maybe we could even 
instantiate a peer-review system where if you think you want to post something, 
you get a set of 3 pRandomly chosen list members to send it to first. >8^D

On 1/25/21 2:18 PM, Frank Wimberly wrote:
> Can you all be careful about the use of acronyms?  You're not as bad as my 
> daughter whose emails are full of BRB, IDK, WYD, etc.  Unless you're sure 
> that it's universally known why not put its meaning in parentheses the first 
> time you use it in an email and then use it freely after that.


-- 
↙↙↙ uǝlƃ

- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/

Reply via email to