I don't think so, no. A conversation in meat space is governed by the laws of meat space, like r^3 pressure waves and such. Our biology [has|is] a (very good) model of meat space. I doubt that our biology has a model of net space at all. Perhaps we're *growing* such anatomy as we speak. E.g. our conversation(s) about causal models and graphs. But my guess is net space is inherently non-intuitive for most animals.
On 2/15/21 11:49 AM, [email protected] wrote: > But aren't all "private" conversations just like that? > > Isn't that why confessions are most likely to occur between strangers on > trains? -- ↙↙↙ uǝlƃ - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. . FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
