Thanks, Roger. Drawn in by a good pun, I read the whole thing. Thank God for the climate rebellion at the Cato Instituter! Well, thank someone, anyway.
The argument about wealth imbalance near the end left me bemused. I just didn’t quite understand it. The exposition was just a bit to quippish for my old brain. If anyone could make it clearer, I would be grateful. I thought it might be a form of the argument that a decision NOT to do something is just as much a decision as the decision TO do something. N Nick Thompson <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] <https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/> https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/ From: Friam <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Roger Frye Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 9:54 AM To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[email protected]> Subject: [FRIAM] Libertarian Walks into a Bear https://3quarksdaily.com/3quarksdaily/2021/02/what-do-you-call-a-republican-who-smokes-pot.html
- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. . FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
