Dave, 

 

Did I understand you correctly?  Is your quandary accurately expressed below.  
If genes modulate the growth of skull, and jaws differentially, how can  “face” 
become a thing for the purposes of natural selection.  I think this question IS 
the basic challenge of evolutionary theory.  It is the question of the 
evolution of modularity.   I have always imagined that the answer lay in some 
attractor in developmental systems … blah blah.  But SteveG persistently 
reminds me that it might be scaffolded by physical systems, in exactly the same 
way that life’s origins was scaffolded by the molecular structure of white 
smoker vents in the sea bottom.  How could physical systems scaffold natural 
selection?

 

Nick   

 

Nick Thompson

 <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]

 <https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/> 
https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/

 

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> 
Sent: Sunday, March 14, 2021 11:57 PM
To: 'The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group' <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [FRIAM] Spandrel

 

All==

 

I want to call attention to Dave’s quandary at the end of his last message to 
me.   If genes are not “for” traits but for processes, how does natural 
selection manage to “pick out” traits.   How do you take a vastly interacting 
causal web and get additivity of variance out of it.  It seems to me that 
Steve’s pathway talk might lead to an answer to that question.  Of what process 
is natural selection the PRODUCT?  Who or what selects the selector?  

 

Nick 

 

Nick Thompson

 <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]

 <https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/> 
https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/

 

From: Friam <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > On 
Behalf Of Eric Charles
Sent: Sunday, March 14, 2021 11:01 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> >
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Spandrel

 

Steve, 

Yes exactly! Humans were not selected "for noses." Humans were (the argument 
goes) selected for shorter jaws. The "protruding" nose is what you end up with 
after selection shrinks the jaw. So, if you notice that humans have noses, and 
you jump straight to asking "Why did protruding noses evolve? What adaptive 
function do they serve?" you are barking up the wrong tree. Ditto impacted 
wisdom teeth. It would be pretty silly to assert that impacted wisdom teeth 
were adaptive, even though they likely resulted from natural selection through 
the same pressures that led to noses.

 

Now, the problem with the "nose" example is that, given the variation in noses 
around the world, it is actually quite plausible that nose size and shape IS 
adaptive. But that's a different issue ;- ) 

 

 

On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 12:50 AM Steve Smith <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

Nick -

Not to beat a dead Spandrel, but the nose example doesn't wash with me.  

In many familiar animals, the nose is perched on the end of a snout, and
it was the snout that was deprecated in us to the point that the
nostril-holes with various adaptive properties (downward facing to keep
rain out, hair-lined and snotty to trap dust and pollen, (mildly)
turbinated to support humidity/temperature regulation, sensitive to
support "feeling" things with one's proboscis before we smash the whole
face into it,  loaded with chemically sensitive cells for "smell", etc)
are highly diminished compared to various creatures like a daschund or
an elephant or an anteater.   Our nose still has significant affordances
similar/familiar to those listed above (serviceable smeller, filter,
heat/humidity exchanger, etc ) even if it is not at all prehensile or
particularly discriminating and if humans have a snout at all, it is a
highly diminished one.  

I suspect references to "being nosy" and "sticking our noses in other's
business" is borrowed from watching our snoutful familiars like horses
or camels or racoons or dogs "nosing around".  The proboscis of our nose
*points* where our eyes are looking (somewhat) so that conflation may be
mildly meaningful?

Does "butting out" connote backing out butt-first when one recognizes
their nosing around isn't welcome?

<beep><beep><beep>

 - Sneeze



- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam 
<http://bit.ly/virtualfriam> 
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/

- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/

Reply via email to