I would add that while having wealth allows one to expand one's repertoire, not having wealth fails to be a simple negation. Not having wealth, like burn-out, is to be in conditions that make one less likely to expand repertoire in the future, to be compulsively agreeable for instance. Wage slavery comes with many externalities to be explored, and only the wealthy can truly afford to be nice.
At some point a few years ago, I decided on a flat tipping rate when partaking in services where one's wage is dependent on tipping. It is a small thing, but as an individual, I want to decouple the quality of service from the right to make a living. At the very least, I do not wish to be part of the punishment-reward cycle, it's inappropriate. Still, others may see it as voting. That I am abstaining means that others will have more say in the molding of wage slaves. -- Sent from: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/ - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. . FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
