I've had several experiences in the working world where people do seem to give special status to the original post. In the politically correct view, the original post is one where we can reflect on its wisdom (and sometimes apply thumbs-up or smiley-face emoticons) but it is awkward and frowned upon to question any premises in the referenced article! To me it all seems like a coercive way to control conversations.
-----Original Message----- From: Friam <[email protected]> On Behalf Of u?l? ??? Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 10:28 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [FRIAM] WAS Friday Fodder IS NOW: dangly bits Oooooooh! A refusal to eat one's own dog food <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eating_your_own_dog_food>. That's a heinous crime! A complete conversation about spandrels must include thread bending. On 3/23/21 10:17 AM, [email protected] wrote: > “Tangential” would seem to understate the case. Please reply here > if you want to talk about Arnold’s dangly bitsl Please please do not gum up > a perfectly good conversation about spandrels. -- ↙↙↙ uǝlƃ - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. . FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/ - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. . FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
