Maybe. But remember, despite the prescriptive linguists out there: a) "troll" is not an insult and b) it can be accidental.
All 3 of Russ' "people with grants", Barry's "rent seeking", and Pieter's "publishing profits are bad for science" responses are a trawler's delight! Rather than talk about the Strawman fallacy and it's variations, we're talking ... [sigh] again ... about capitalism and money. Call it naivete if you want. But it was a very effective troll. On 6/30/21 7:47 AM, [email protected] wrote: > Oh, I see. The point is to make getting the individual item so expensive > that it just balances driving to the library (or doing ILL) with subscribing > to the Journal. It's pure manipulation; costs have nothing to do with it. > > Glen, I think you persistently confuse naivete with trolling. -- ☤>$ uǝlƃ - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. . FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
