DAVE, 

 

Consider the request made.  We monists have to stick together.

 

Does anybody know where Roger is?   I hope he’s not in Narragansett Bay.

 

N

 

Nick Thompson

[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 

https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/

 

From: Friam <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Prof David West
Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2021 11:37 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [FRIAM] mysticism

 

RE: Mysticism. Peradventure (archaic sense of the word) the following, 
paraphrased from an honors class I used to teach at St. Thomas, would be of 
interest to this group. (Sorry if disjointed — artifact of semester class to 
single post.)

 

Everyone is aware how our perceptions, our knowledge, and our understanding of 
the universe was altered with successive inventions like the lens (telescope), 
radio astronomy, and the ability to detect multiple spectra from infrared to 
X-ray.

 

For the sake of this discussion, grant an assumption of an individual mind 
embedded in, perceiving (experiencing), and interacting with a pervasive 
Reality. (An analog of an individual stargazer/astronomer.)

 

If we imagine "Reality Apprehension Technology;" is it unreasonable to assume 
that our perceptions, knowledge, and understanding, of Reality would be altered 
in some manner analogous to our enhanced scientific comprehension of the 
universe?

 

The Mystic would assert, "of course."

 

And, predictably, there are numerous advocates of various "technologies': 
ranging from meditations to exercises to drugs. But the most ancient 
traditions, pretty much universally, assert that no "technology" needs to be 
added at all. Innate to every organism, including humans, is a complete 
"Reality Apprehension System." 

 

The near opposite of what was required to enhance our understanding of 
astronomy is required to enhance our understanding of Reality. Instead to 
"adding" something, we must "eliminate" something.

 

That which is to be eliminated, is a host of "brain accretions" that put 
artificial barriers between our 'apparent mind' and "it's" apprehension of 
Reality. (My dualism is temporary and for the purpose of explanation only.)

 

An example of an "accretion:" consider a person in a jungle. Imagine the 
totality of sensory inputs (and not just the traditional 5) constantly 
bombarding that person. Now imagine the survival potential that a person whose 
brain had developed filtering shortcuts like edge detection, or part-whole 
generalization, over one who had to evaluate and analyze the entirety of the 
sensory input volume before concluding: "Tiger! Run."

 

Another: the attenuation of our awareness to "background" noise, simply because 
it is constant. We are not unaware of that noise — if someone across the room 
mentions our name we are immediately tuned into it — but it is below the 
threshold of conscious awareness.

 

Culture is another accretion, as is "rationality" (the ascendance of the left 
brain). (Science is a manifestation of the latter accretion, or rather what can 
be accomplished when we employ it.)

 

The net effect of all these accretions is to 'reduce' our Apprehension of 
Reality and restrict it to a small subset of stimuli that evolution, or habit 
or predilection, has deemed "important" or worth paying attention to.

 

And, of course, the Illusion of Maya is taking the 'VGA image' of Reality and 
accepting that it is the only thing "Real."

 

The full "Reality Apprehension System" of every organism continues to operate, 
even when we are foundering in the Illusion. What is lacking is awareness of 
that System and its products (knowledge, understanding, perception). We regain 
awareness by circumventing/eliminating all those pesky 'accretions'.

 

The famous Zen parable of a pond filled with ripples and waves; making it 
impossible to see a clear and accurate depiction of the Moon on the surface of 
the pond. Only when you have 'stilled' the multiple disturbances will the moon 
be reflected in all its glory upon the still surface.

 

  *  *  *  *

 

>From this small thought kernel it is possible to develop a semester worth of 
>lectures and the various aspects of Mysticism and its challenges and arguments 
>against, etc.

 

Not addressed: what is the "value" or what is to be "gained" if one is 
successful in regaining awareness of the "Reality Apprehension System" and its 
products?

 

Another time, I will eliminate the dualism, the illusion of an "I" apart from 
Reality, but only upon request.

 

davew

 

- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/

Reply via email to