Get out your steelman kit, because I absolutely DON’T believe that an 
epiphenomenon is a thing.  What I do think is that  every thing is both 
phenomenon and epiphenomenon depending on how we look it, depending on the 
interpretant we bring to bear.   So that the smoke cloud is llama shape is 
epiphenomenal with respect to the development of the cloud unless on considers 
that the shading provided by a llama shaped cloud might effect the development 
of the fire that makes the smoke.  
I think many important arguments concern whether some consequence is phenomenal 
or epiphenomoenal. Consider the concept of collateral damage. What's a few 
children when will killed a thousand  terriorists with the same policy.   Well, 
five years later when you are withdrawing your troops under a hail of gunfire, 
you discover that there was nothing collateral about that damage except in the 
very narrow frame that bounded your thought.  Nick 

Nick Thompson
[email protected]
https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/

-----Original Message-----
From: Friam <[email protected]> On Behalf Of u?l? ?>$
Sent: Sunday, September 19, 2021 1:09 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Can a robot have a soul?

No, I think you fully believe that. Where we disagree is that I think 
epiphenomena are purely an artifact of the formal language used. That means if 
your language is not formal, then you have no epiphenomena. All this informal 
talk you engage in, here, contains nothing like a well-defined thing we could 
name "epiphenomenon".

Take Frank up on reading the book on Lie groups or the Baez chapter. Or help 
Jon formalize it. Then, I think, we'll have a way to disentangle phenomena from 
epiphenomena ... and *then* we can falsify my claim that they don't validate 
against the real world.

On 9/19/21 8:22 AM, [email protected] wrote:
>  Whether something is epiphenomenal or not is in the eye of the 
> beholder.  Glen thinks I disagree with that, but I don’t.  Where we genuinely 
> disagree, I think, is in the relative value of a life spent looking for 
> frames that encompass other frames.  What might be an entertainment for him 
> is kind of obsession for me.

--
"Better to be slapped with the truth than kissed with a lie."
☤>$ uǝlƃ


.-- .- -. - / .- -.-. - .. --- -. ..--.. / -.-. --- -. .--- ..- --. .- - .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn UTC-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:
 5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
 1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/



.-- .- -. - / .- -.-. - .. --- -. ..--.. / -.-. --- -. .--- ..- --. .- - .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn UTC-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:
 5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
 1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Reply via email to