Thanks for the link to this specific treatment of intolerance. In my youth, I was known to claim: "I am tolerant of everything except intolerance" which of course was at best aspirational and more likely just plain delusional.

While it applies well and obviously to the "culture wars" somewhat unevenly but not without exemplary exceptions,  it also seems to apply by extension to the elaborated context of the 2nd Amendment.   As a "western man" raised on guns, guts and glory, I am comfortable around guns and know that they can in fact be "useful tools" though less and less so in modern society and most especially for a vegetarian like myself.   What I am *intolerant* of is their use as tools for bullying.   Among my gun loving acquaintances (some to be called proper friends) there is a habit of brandishing the fact of their guns (and ammo and ability and willingness to use both) in the face of those they disagree with or disapprove of.   The ones I call friends probably don't even realize that their "gun talk" has a bullying undertone they don't recognize it is so "under".

I have a plethora of anecdotes (really, me?) on this topic but the general theme seems to be to alert and remind others that they have the willingness and ability to assert their will through deadly force *at-a-distance*.   These are not (just) varmint guns (e.g. .22 single-shot rifles suitable for exterminating nuisance rats, squirrels, gophers, skunks, bunnies, raccoons, and even coyotes and bobcats from a dozen yards away) or even "deer rifles" (small capacity, medium caliber, bolt action, possibly scoped, suitable for killing a medium sized animal from up to 100 yards away), but instead most often weapons designed for *modern* warfare variously with the potential for *very* high capacity magazines, rapid-fire shooting (even without a low-tech bump-stock), specialized ammunition (variously for piercing armor and/or causing extreme hydrostatic shock) and precision targeting at a great distance (high-velocity rounds, extreme optical magnification and even night-vision).  When noted that such are not useful for any obvious *legal* or *sane* application, they stakes get raised to implying the need to "throw off government tyranny".   My "local" police department (Pojoaque Pueblo) has all of these weapons as well, and more, including  armored personnel carriers handed down from the military (yay?).   They had them on prominent display for years but recently seem to have found a garage somewhere to keep them in, I doubt they have relinquished these "toys", I think I see them out for maintenance now and then.

I don't talk much with my gun-nut friends about their arsenals, I'm prone to end up saying things like "Come the Apocalypse, while I don't own any guns, I know lots of people who do, and where they keep them and whether they actually properly secure them".   This really raises hackles, so I don't even start down that path.    It all (including my implied threats) seems to be a (re)assertion/corollary to "Might makes Right" which is obviously compelling to the logic that builds and maintains bullies.

The paradox of intolerance applies acutely to the reality of bullies...

- Steve

On 12/13/21 10:07 AM, uǝlƃ ☤>$ wrote:
Pack the Court
https://electoral-vote.com/#item-3

Don't pack the court:
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3982144

This evokes the paradox of tolerance: 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance

As Trump et al have shown us, that sect of the right *will* pack the court 
when/if it suits them. Biden will probably decide *not* to make the attempt. 
But there will be no political will to pass a law *preventing* court packing. 
So the moderate Dems won't pack the court. But they'll happily leave the option 
open to the next Republican administration. It's an excellent example of how 
tolerance eliminates tolerance by tolerating intolerance.



.-- .- -. - / .- -.-. - .. --- -. ..--.. / -.-. --- -. .--- ..- --. .- - .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn UTC-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:
5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Reply via email to