I think DT refers simply to the remaining fraction of Deuterium/Tritium
remaining after the reaction event (-4%) without specific accounting for
remaining D vs T.
My understanding is that D-T fusion occurs at a lower temperature than
D-D but that once fusion commences (starting with D-T), both D-T and D-D
reactions occurring in similar amounts. In laser-driven ICF (as with
NIF) I believe the ratio of D/T is nominally 50/50 though it would seem
to make sense to have a higher T to D ratio but most references I see
imply equal portions. An equal number of D-D and D-T reactions would
seem to consume D more quickly, though as that commences, the D/T ratio
would go down, making D-T reactions (yet) more likely... tricky
business, no wonder it has taken decades to get to this point?
The Wikipedia Entry on ICF is pretty good:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inertial_confinement_fusion
I found several popular science Articles which seem to reinforce my
sense that this "breakthrough" is not as significant as implied:
https://www.science.org/content/article/fusion-breakthrough-nif-uh-not-really
Other interesting/relevant links regarding D-T and D-D fusion...
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263507001_Species_separation_and_modification_of_neutron_diagnostics_in_inertial-confinement_fusion/figures?lo=1
https://www.energy.gov/science/doe-explainsnuclear-fusion-reactions
<https://www.energy.gov/science/doe-explainsnuclear-fusion-reactions>
https://science.jrank.org/pages/4732/Nuclear-Fusion-D-D-D-T-reactions.html
<https://science.jrank.org/pages/4732/Nuclear-Fusion-D-D-D-T-reactions.html>
On 12/13/22 4:36 PM, glen wrote:
That's why I asked. I guess I'll assume DT means both deuterium and
tritium, not just deuterium. If you were going to track fuel use,
you'd track the rarer part more closely, right?
On 12/13/22 09:22, Frank Wimberly wrote:
DT = deuterium?
---
Frank C. Wimberly
140 Calle Ojo Feliz,
Santa Fe, NM 87505
505 670-9918
Santa Fe, NM
On Tue, Dec 13, 2022, 10:21 AM glen <geprope...@gmail.com
<mailto:geprope...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Awesome. Thanks. I'm still trying to catch up with the QC
Wormhole kerfuffle. Who knew Quanta was so click baity?
What is "DT"?
On 12/13/22 09:02, Marcus Daniels wrote:
> In case no one wanted to get up at 7:00am to watch DOE
administrators talk:
>
>
> 1. Controlling the laser in space and time was important for
maintaining symmetry. Timing precision of 25e-12 secs and laser
spatial precision of 5e-12 meter were needed. This was thought to be
the main explanation for the achievement.
>
> 2. 8% more power on the laser this time
>
> 3. x-ray tomography is used to find flaws in the capsules.
Developing software to do the counting.
>
> 4. They have ongoing efforts to study the fabrication systems
and their components (done in Germany) to find idiosyncrasies of each.
>
> 5. Laser technology improvements since NIF was built which are
20% more efficient.
>
> 6. Target cost is from labor, and it takes 7 months each
>
> 7. 4% of DT is burned in a shot
>
> 8. Machine learning ties together radiation hydrodynamics and
experimental data. (It sounded preliminary.)
>
> 9. The (successful) capsule had more defects than previous
experiments. However, previous experiments did show benefits from
capsule quality.
>
> 10. 15% of experiments are indirect drive of this kind, 15% of
experiments are other approaches to ignition. The rest are weapons
and materials characterization.
>
> 11. Anomalous laser directional control were problems in the
summer runs. Fixed that.
-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe / Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives: 5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
1/2003 thru 6/2021 http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/