It seems to me the diachronic is fight a losing battle.   The solar system, the 
billions of people in the world, and especially the rich and powerful, will do 
what they do, and it will mostly drive individuals to adapt and react.   It 
isn't meaningful to expect people to have coherent stories.   Coherence comes 
at the cost of isolation.  

-----Original Message-----
From: Friam <[email protected]> On Behalf Of glen
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2022 8:45 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] PostHumanism/Modernism/Anthropocene

I so *wanted* to comment on that 60 page paper. But it's too much. I ended up 
skimming and skipping along. One thing that does seem relevantly missing (?) is 
Strawson's distinction between diachronic and narrative. An aspect of some 
(maybe rare, I'm too ignorant to say) post[structural|modern]ists is an implied 
accusation that modernists are *intentionally* narrative, rather than 
narrativity being a (natural?) artifact of our necessary diachronicity. And I 
didn't see much mention of *meta*narratives, as opposed to narratives. Even we 
episodics have, in our episodes, narratives. The main difference, as always, 
comes in how one *composes* one's episodes. [⛧] Similarly, a more nuanced 
understanding of postmodernism relies on the criticism of meta-narrativity more 
so than narrativity writ small. In that way, we can imagine gradations of 
posthuman[ism|s], where we go through ordinal "stages" ... higher order 
operators can be built upon priors when and only when (wwhen? whenn? like 
"iff"?) the priors have frozen into manipulable building blocks. And if we 
imagine it that way, whatever meta-narratives *emerge* depends on the 
historical accidents of those freezing stages, the "shapes" of those building 
blocks.


[⛧] Maybe also in how one decomposes/analyzes/deconstructs one's episodes.

On 12/20/22 16:36, Marcus Daniels wrote:
> I’ve been thinking I580 along the East Bay would make a nice place for sea 
> creatures to hide, and a good concrete foundation for a bike lane on piers.  
> So quiet it would be without the cars.  Bring on the sea level rise!
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On Dec 20, 2022, at 2:43 PM, Steve Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Here's my latest positive hit from Academia
>>
>> Countdown to Extinction? - Posthumanism in Science Fiction
>>
>> Raoul Guariguata
>>
>> https://www.academia.edu/2061036/Countdown_to_Extinction_Posthumanism
>> _in_Science_Fiction
>>
>> I could rattle on for pages about my take on this, but the short version is 
>> that I found this *very* readable and helped me appreciate the role of 
>> postmodernism and it's relationship to posthumanism cast in the backdrop of 
>> a century (and a half) of scientifiction/romance writing/speculating.
>>
>> Oh yeh, and also with the backdrop of the impending extinction-by-excess arc 
>> humans are on as we argue over when to *start* the Anthropocene when it is 
>> likely it is also about to *end* in the shortest-lived geological epoch of 
>> all time?!
>>
>> @EricS Fermi Paradox indeed!


--
ꙮ Mɥǝu ǝlǝdɥɐuʇs ɟᴉƃɥʇ' ʇɥǝ ƃɹɐss snɟɟǝɹs˙ ꙮ -. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / 
-- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Reply via email to