Ooops, I forget to complete this thought in my last message: On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 10:14 PM, Bill Page wrote: > On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 6:51 PM, Mike Hansen wrote: >> >> I actually removed the use of unparse and InputForm in the latest >> changes because of things like >> >> (6) -> unparse(2.123 :: InputForm) >> >> (6) "float(156649750673941512323,-66,2)" >> Type: String >> >> which is not quite what we want for the Sage interface. > > I think it is not so bad since by defining the function float > appropriately this can easily parse this into a Sage floating > point. If this really is inconvenient then the ... >
I think the best way to solve this problem is to adapt "unparse" to produce a more commonly employed linear format. This is a correction that can be considered upstream by the FriCAS developers. But in the mean time the Sage interface can apply a temporary fix. Regards, Bill Page. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
