Waldek Hebisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > And, if possible, on various OS and various lisps. > > I just finished the standard tests using sbcl, gcl and Closure CL > (former openmcl) on 2.2 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo running 64-bit Debian. I see > no regressions.
Wonderful. Remains MS Windows and MaxOSX, I believe? > Timing for test suite are: ... > I think conclusion from measurements is clear: the SPADCALL patch gives > significant speedup for sbcl (of order 15-25%) while impact on gcl and > Closure CL is much smaller (probably within measurement noise). Shouldn't the timings (safety 0) be quite different from the default -- I believe it's (safety 1), isn't it? What the SPADCALL patch does, is, as you know, 1 check whether the argument is a function, call it if this is the case, 2 otherwise fail. instead of 1 check whether the argument is a function, call it if this is the case, 1a otherwise check whether symbol-function is set, call it if so, 2 otherwise fail. This *should* give some speedup, but I think the expensive check for the algebra (not the interpreter!) is 1. Martin --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
