>>> Second: sbcl and especially ecl like it much better if you compile the lsp
>>> files generated with the aldor compiler
>> What does that mean?
>
> ecl complains about "too large jump" in aldor-combinat, unless you compile the
> files. sbcl is *much* faster on compiled files.
Does that just mean that instead of
for f in $(ar t libcombinatax.al); do
echo ")lib $f" >> combinat.input;
done
we should have something like
for f in $(ar t libcombinatax.al); do
n=$(basename $f .ao);
echo ")compile $n.lsp" >> combinat.input;
echo ")lib $n" >> combinat.input;
done
in Aldor-combinat?
Ralf
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"FriCAS - computer algebra system" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
