Martin Rubey wrote:
> Martin Rubey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > "Gabriel Dos Reis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > The original problem is completely orthogonal to this currification stuff,
> > > can and should be fixed -- it it just an oversight in the codes.
> >
> > It would be wonderful if you could fix that. I hope that my examples are
> > helpful...
> >
>
> Gaby, Waldek, please let me know if there is anything I could do to help you
> fix this problem?
>
> Monday morning would be wonderful...
>
This is an old bug. IIRC in Issue Tracker we have a few reports
that looks like this problem.
In the past I looked at code handling closures and my impression
was that the code was "broken by design". More precisely, to
correctly handle closures one needs precise information about
scopes (including information which symbols represent variables).
It seems that part of scope information is never collected and
part is alredy lost when closures are handled.
I may be wrong and it is possible a simple fix will cure things.
However, given that I do not believe in a simple fix to closure
problem I did not spent much time searching for such fix.
--
Waldek Hebisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"FriCAS - computer algebra system" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---