Martin Rubey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I don't understand why map (eq +-> numerical rhs eq) fails.
>
> because it should be map (eq +-> numeric rhs eq, LR)? Or are you asking why
> numeric is not provided for Konvert Complex Float? The latter might indeed
> make
> sense, I think.
I just checked: currently it is called complexNumeric. I guess the reason is
that numeric has no way to guess the type of the result otherwise:
(22) -> numeric(sqrt 3::Complex EXPR INT)
(22) 1.7320508075 688772935
Type: Float
But actually, maybe it would make sense to have
numeric: EXPR COMPLEX INT -> Complex Float
and
numeric: EXPR INT -> Float
where the latter fails, if the argument is not real?
Martin
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"FriCAS - computer algebra system" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
