Martin,
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 4:33 AM, you wrote:
> ...
> I noticed that my spad file was flawed, it seems that I can't get Rep and
> % right in Spad. In aldor it's so easy... At least, now FriCAS doesn't
> complain anymore about the Rep.
>
> Could we add these two macro definitions to FriCAS? (I'd rather have
> them as macros, not builtin as in Open-Axiom, I must admit)
>
> macro {
> rep x == ((x)@%) pretend Rep;
> per r == ((r)@Rep) pretend %;
> }
>
>From my point of view these operations are an essential part of the
SPAD language even though most of the legacy code in the Axiom library
does not use them in a type-sage manner.
Could you explain why you prefer these to be pre-defined macros rather
than being builtin as Gaby has done in OpenAxiom and Aldor?
Regards,
Bill Page.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"FriCAS - computer algebra system" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
