Martin Rubey wrote:
>
> Waldek Hebisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Next, I think that mixing signature lists with tests is a bad idea:
> > export list of category should clearly show exports. Tests add
> > almost nothing to description of functions and break continuity of
> > export list.
>
> OK. A compromise would be to do the tests after a block of exports,
> or after the list of exports just before the add. Would this be
> acceptable to you?
>
After the list of exports? Yes.
> I disagree completely with (*), but I agree that I should have
> explained. For a long time, I was unsure where function specific
> tests really belong, but I am now convinced that they belong to the
> category, where they are declared, if there is such a category.
>
<snip>
> It follows, that the tests belong to the category, and should test
> *many, if not all* domains that inherit from that category.
>
> I actually intended to add also some tests for power series domains,
> but I was low on time.
>
> Bottomline, would the following be OK for you? (given that I add
> tests for other domains in future) If so, I'd like to take it as a
> model for other tests...
>
Your message deserves longer answer, unfortunatly I am in hurry now.
In short, it is better to have more tests, so I find the following
acceptable. However, I prefer different organization of source files.
> Martin
>
> <<category ATRIG ArcTrigonometricFunctionCategory>>=
> )abbrev category ATRIG ArcTrigonometricFunctionCategory
<snip>
--
Waldek Hebisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"FriCAS - computer algebra system" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
