Ralf Hemmecke <[email protected]> writes: | > Gaby commented in the OpenAxiom thread on this subject that he thought | > the problem might be overloading of *. Does it make sense to use the | > symbol * to denote mulitiplication of a Matrix by a row vector | > (DirectProduct)? | | Why should that be a problem?
It isn't THE source of the problem. [...] | The problem is the interpreter not the library. >From the message sent on June 05, 2010 http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_name=877hmdxxmu.fsf%40gauss.cs.tamu.edu # Yes: why the interpreter should also have tried the second signature to # find out that it can work, therefore at least report an ambiguity. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel?hl=en.
