Martin, may I ask what this is?
I already do not like Union(t: T, "failed"), because that "failed" is
certainly not a string in that context, because Union, actually wants a
type, right?
I'm sorry, but if it goes on like this....
On 07/09/2010 12:14 PM, [email protected] wrote:
+ ATANFLAG ==> Union("complex", _
+ "real: two sides", _
+ "real: left side", _
+ "real: right side", _
+ "just do it")
then I now raise my voice and say: stop it! If you want an Enumeration
type then call for an extension of the language, but please don't misuse
Union.
Ralf
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS -
computer algebra system" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel?hl=en.
