[email protected] writes: | Dear all, | | when trying to implement the order relation on set partitions, | I found it impossible to use "<=". | Somehow the interpreter always converts "x<=y" into "not(y<x)", | even if "<=" is implemented explicitly. | This is incorrect for a non-linear order.
The names '<', '<=', '>', and '>=' are supposed to be associated with linear orderings by several components (parser, compiler, interpreter, algebra, etc.) (though OpenAxiom has eliminated some (but not all) of those assumptions in the parser.) | What is the recommended way to handle non-linear orders? | Not to use "<" at all? Yes. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel?hl=en.
