On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 8:06 AM, Ralf Hemmecke wrote: > ... > Nevertheless. I think it makes sense to be able to produce a 1D output > (=String) from OutputForm. It's just another output format like latex. > > Do I miss something? >
I think OutputForm does explicitly assume a 2-d format, see for example hconcat and vconcat operators. But one possibility for "1-d" output might be in fact be InputForm, e.g. expr(x::InputForm) which is available for many domains. Bill Page. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel?hl=en.
