Martin Baker <[email protected]> writes: | On Wednesday 12 Oct 2011 17:09:44 Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: | > Martin Baker <[email protected]> writes: | > | Strangely enough (just for the record) although per is not a known | > | function in FriCAS the following line does not produce a compile | > | error: | > | | > | arbitrary == per(-1) | > | | > | but it did not return the expected type, so I had to do: | > | | > | per(x:Rep):% == x pretend % | > | arbitrary == per(-1) | > | > I think the latter was part of what Bill said. | | What I'm saying is, in FriCAS, if rep is called but not defined, then I get a | compiler error: | >> Apparent user error: | cannot compile (rep a) | | but if per is called but not defined then there is no compiler error (except | for possible type mismatch in other parts of the program). | | Is that what Bill said?
No. :-) The first part of your elaboration makes things clearer now and brings a different understanding. Thanks. -- Gaby -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel?hl=en.
