If I had to guess the first suspect is 'interop.boot', but IME guesses usually are wrong...
You hit it without running make. Well done! > The error message alone gives too little information. Backtrace > typically gives more information -- sometimes it is possible > to identify routine containing error, in other cases it > may give good start point for tracing. Backtrace? How? And how to start tracing? By using ")trace some-func"? Now which function to trace is the question. Looks like I will become a lisp expert after that. ;-) Ralf -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel?hl=en.
