>
> Waldek Hebisch <[email protected]> writes:
>
> [...]
>
> | I would discourage using this form of macro definition -- it
> | just wastes potentially valuable syntax for trivial purpose.
> | AFAICS there are no uses of 'macro' in algebra.
>
> For what it is worth, OpenAxiom leans in the opposite direction: the
> recommended style is
>
> macro m == expr
>
> over
>
> m ==> expr
>
> hoping that in the future, ==> will be deprecated and removed.
> There is no grouping though.
Any reason for this choice? 'xx ==>' is used a lot in algebra
and is shorter than 'macro xx ==' so I would expect some strong
argument for such change.
--
Waldek Hebisch
[email protected]
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"FriCAS - computer algebra system" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel?hl=en.
