Mark Clements wrote:
>
> Without following this thread closely, why not use:
>
> (9) -> integer PARSE_-INTEGER("111111111111111")$Lisp
>
> (9) 111111111111111
> Type: PositiveInteg=
> er
>
I admit that I forgot about PARSE_-INTEGER (I do not know why
original low level routines use READ_-FROM_-STRING). Testing
shows that for small numbers sbcl PARSE_-INTEGER is much
faster than READ_-FROM_-STRING, but for larger the opposite
holds.
--
Waldek Hebisch
[email protected]
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"FriCAS - computer algebra system" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel?hl=en.
