On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Serge D. Mechveliani <[email protected]> wrote: > > Such types also can be defined in {\tt Spad}, but the code will > be considerably more complex (I complained on this). > As an example, see in the Axiom source the definition for the > domain of BinaryTree (or, maybe, Tree). > I wonder whether it is simpler in Aldor. >
In the context of this group I find your comment rather annoying and I wonder how you define "complex" in such a way that it allows an objective comparison. Regards, Bill Page. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel?hl=en.
