On 05/05/2013 11:43 AM, Prof. Dr. Johannes Grabmeier wrote: > This is a good idea, many such inconsistencies are around and we > should really work on that. Another example is inverting elements. > > In Monoid we have recip, in Group we have inv. For SquareMatrix we > have an additional > > if R has Field then inverse: % -> Union(%,"failed")
I agree and would call all these functions inverse: % -> % and inverseIfCan: % -> Union(%,"failed"). But before I work more seriously on the library, I wait until the "extend" keyword exists in SPAD. ;-) Ralf -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
