jiazhaoconga wrote: > > I am making an emacs lisp backend for the Boot compiler, that is, > we can get a Boot compiler running in emacs after we compile > those Boot compiler source files (written in Boot language) into elisp. > > It is almost done. Most work are done in elisp side to adapt the subset > of common lisp that Boot compiler generates. Although some changes > to Boot sources are necessary due to the ability of elisp. > > The motivation is that I wish to have a good development environment > for spad and mostly, spad compiler. With the language compiler (parser) > available in elisp, it should provide semantic and advanced support for > developing. (a lot of work need to do though)
I wonder how well Boot output maps into elisp? Boot and Spad output is deliberatly limited to allows much simpler Lisp-s than Common Lisp as a target. I expected problems with elisp ... Concerning Spad semantics, much is done after parser. > There was a discussion about the plan to rewrite spad compiler in spad: > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/fricas-devel/j1Dy0RextZw/dokLODCj8HMJ > > I don't know if that changes or there are some new ideas and discussion > about spad compiler I don't know. I'd like the spad compiler to be written > in > spad, and if that's the future development direction, I hope the development > tools I will create for Boot language will help. There is an effort to move compiler to Spad, but developement is jumpy with only very small recent progress. -- Waldek Hebisch [email protected] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
