On 04/04/14 12:13, Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
For example, in something relatively simple like this:(1) -> parseFromString("2*3.4")$Lisp (1) (* 2 (($elt (Float) float) 34 - 1 10)) Type: SExpression we might just get away without high level structuresAre you sure? Can you please properly parse the argument of stdout in the attached program and compute the result without executing the program. ;-) OK, that's Aldor, but why would we want SPAD not also let you do something like that? Ralf
You are taking that comment out of context. The point I was trying to make is that: an advantage of doing a boot code to spad conversion is to get high level, properly typed structures. By doing a line-by-line conversion and using SExpression for all structures we don't get such advantages.
Martin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
