>> I rather changed the axiom.sty definition of \spadcommand, so that
>> inside its argument one can simply write \spadcommand{a ^ b} and it will
>> come out properly.> That makes sense, we may assume that appropriate '\spadcommand' > is defined. In fact, it's not totally easy. The \xtcLong command is not how one would nowadays define that stuff. When it eats its arguments catcodes will be assigned and then it's already too late for \spadcommand to relax the backslash rule.. I think in the first round, I will have to stay with \^ and friends. :-( Ralf -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
