Hi, > The interface of Segment suggests the first, because from (B) it would > be generally impossible to extract high(s) from a segment s. So in > this sense, Waldek is right to treat (2) and (4) in the same way. > > Personally, it would also be more intuitive to me that m(3..1,1..2) > behaves just the same as m(2..1,1..2), because I would naturally look > at it as if it were written m(expand(3..1), expand(1..2)).
Isn't that one of the two options I spoke about? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
