On 18 May 2014 17:43, Ralf Hemmecke <[email protected]> wrote: > ... > Anyway, I usually introduce > > rep x ==> (x@%) pretend Rep > per x ==> (x@Rep) pretend % > > right at the top of the file, making them global macros for possibly > several domains in the file. Well not a real problem, but I'd like to > have them logically at the top of the file. >
It seems to me that rep and per really ought to be defined as part of the SPAD language in the same manner as Rep. It seems silly to have to explicitly include them as macros. Rep, rep and per should all be built-in. Ultimately there should be no automatic or implicit conversions to and from Rep. It seems to me that these hidden conversions are a source of confusion in legacy SPAD code that does not use rep and per. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
