Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
>
> Hi Waldek,
>
> My BOOT knowledge isn't that great, but here
>
> https://github.com/fricas/fricas/blob/master/src/interp/c-doc.boot#L637
>
> I see an unconditional return that is followed by further code.
> The (seemingly unused) code seems to not only remove the "++" but also
> the leading initial blanks coming after it.
>
> Should this unused code be removed?
It looks that whoever wrote original code did not want to loose
version which removes blanks. ATM I can not say which version
is better. AFAICS if ++ comment contains multiple blanks, then
docstring contains '\indented{n}' command which normally is silly,
but may allow for some tabular layout.
Probably it is better to remove such unused code. In long
term we should decide what is allowed in ++ comments and
what it means which may require restoring this code.
However, it is trivial piece, so no harm if we need to
reinvent it in the future.
--
Waldek Hebisch
[email protected]
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"FriCAS - computer algebra system" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
