On 11/03/2015 10:00 PM, Waldek Hebisch wrote:
>> Would your reference to "subsumption mean that you are not going to fix
>> this bug/feature?
> 
> Well, I have to make my mind.  Davenport writes that there should
> be subsumption, but actually does not write why.  Reasons that
> I can give are rather weak.  OTOH there are several places in
> Spad compiler implementing this feature and it is intertwined
> with other features, so if we decide to change behavior it
> will take time.

OK, thanks. Then I'll deal with that issue in another way.
But I'd like to have this on the long term todo list.

Ralf


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"FriCAS - computer algebra system" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to