I completely agree with that 'construct' should not reuse some part of its argument.
What I considered is the very large aggregate case, say millions of elements, takes a few hundred MB memory, in that case, a copy constructor will take double time and space than a destructive constructor. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
